Engaging patients with radiation related skin discomfort in self-care

Crystele Montpetit, Savitri Singh-Carlson

Abstract


Background: Patients receiving radiation to the breast can suffer painful, moist desquamation of the axilla and inframammary fold. Intensity of skin reactions will vary with each individual and be dependent on the total dose of radiation, treatment volume, daily fraction size, energy and type of radiation, as well as other personal factors (Gosselin, 2010). Treatment-related skin reactions make it difficult for women to wear clothing and undergarments comfortably and to perform daily activities. InterDry AG is a textile dressing with an antimicrobial complex that wicks away excess moisture and reduces friction, itching, and burning. Despite showing highly beneficial properties, there is no current published evidence indicating the utility of InterDry Ag for radiation skin reactions. 

Purpose: This project evaluated the potential utility of InterDry Ag dressing to relieve discomfort of skin reactions for breast cancer patients undergoing radiation treatment. 

Methods: A descriptive design was employed to better understand the effectiveness of InterDry Ag dressing in reducing side effects of radiation treatment of the breast for women. Twenty eligible participants consented to participate. A radiation oncology nurse evaluated its effect every five days, utilizing a skin assessment questionnaire developed by the nursing team from clinical observations. 

Results: A personalized skin care regimen was developed with each patient’s feedback. A trusting relationship was developed between the nurse and patient by building rapport that indicated nursing care support. Some women began sharing their emotional stressors with nurses, as well as the physical pain they were experiencing due to the skin reactions. This observation resulted in provision of additional resources for women and engaging them in self-care using a patient-centred approach.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Banning, M.G. & Gumley, V. (2013). Case studies of patient interactions, care provision and the impact of emotion: A qualitative study. Journal of Cancer Education, 28, 656–661.

Bonito, A.H., Horowitz, N., McCorkle, R., & Chagpar, A.B. (2013). Do healthcare professionals discuss the emotional impact of cancer with patients? Psycho-Oncology, 22, 2046–2050.

British Columbia Cancer Agency (2013). British Columbia Symptom Management Guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.bccancer.bc.ca/health-professionals/clinical-resources/nursing/symptom-management

Budischewski, K.F. (2008). Quality of life of breast cancer patients in the course of adjuvant radiotherapy. Support Care Cancer, 16, 299–304.

Canadian Cancer Society (2016). (n.d.). Breast cancer statistics. Retrieved from http://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-type/ breast/statistics/?region=bc

Gosselin, T.K., Schneider, S.M., Plambeck, M.A., & Rowe, K. (2010). A prospective randomized, placebo-controlled skin care study in women diagnosed with breast cancer undergoing radiation therapy. Oncol Nurs Forum, 37(5), 619–626.

Gotz, C., & Singh-Carlson, S. (2014). Mixed methods approach to program evaluation: Measuring impact of a cancer support program. Journal of Women’s Health, Issues & Care, 3(3), 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2325-9795.1000151

Kennedy-Evans, K.L., Smith, D., Viggiano, B., Henn, T. (2007). Multi-site feasibility study using a new textile with silver for management of skin conditions located in skin folds. Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 34(3S), S68.

Kramer, A., Hubner, N.O., Assadian, O., Mulder, G. (2010). Polihexanide-perspectives on clinical wound antisepsis. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology, 23(Suppl 1), 1–3.

Kumar, S., Juresic, E., Barton, M., & Shafiq, J. (2010). Management of skin toxicity during radiation therapy: A review of the evidence. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology, 54(3), 264–79.

Laffin, N.S., Smyth, W., Heyer, E., Fasugba, O., Abernethy, G., & Gardner, A. (2015). Effectiveness and acceptability of a moisturizing cream and a barrier cream during radiation therapy for breast cancer in the tropics. Cancer Nursing, 38(3), 205–2014.

NCI CTCAE (version 4.03). Dermatitis radiation (2013). Retrieved from, H:everyonenursingreferences and guidelinesSymptom Management Guidelinesradiation dermatitis

Noble-Adams, R. (1999). Radiation-induced reactions. 1: An examination of the phenomenon. British Journal of Nursing, 8(17), 1134–40.

Porock, D., & Kristjanson, L. (1999). Skin reactions during radiotherapy for breast cancer: The use and impact of topical agents and dressings, European Journal of Cancer Care, 8, 143–153.

Paterson, D., Poonam, P., Bennett, N.C, Peszynski, R., Beekhuizen, M.J.V., Jasperse, M.L., & Herst, M. (2012). Randomized intra-patient controlled trial of Mepilex Lite Dressings versus Aqueous Cream in managing radiation-induced skin reactions post-mastectomy. Cancer Science & Therapy, 4(11), 347–356.

Schnur, J.O., Ouellette, S.C., Dilorenzo, T.A., Green, S., & Montgomery, G.H. (2011). A qualitative analysis of acute skin toxicity among breast cancer radiotherapy patients. Psycho-Oncology, 20, 260–268.

Sibbald, G.R., Kelley, J., Kennedy-Evans, Labrecque, C., & Waters, N. (2013). A practical approach to the prevention and management of intertrigo, or moisture-associated skin damage, due to perspiration: Expert consensus on best practice. Wound Care Canada, 11(2).

Smith, L.S., Singh-Carlson, S., Downie, L., Payeur, N., & Wai, E. (2011). Survivors of breast cancer: Patient perspectives on survivorship care planning. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 5, 337–44.

Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assess Res Evaluation, 7(17). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17

Tanay, M.W., Wiseman, T., Roberts, & Ream, E. (2013). A time to weep and a time to laugh: Humour in the nurse-patient relationship in an adult cancer setting. Support Care Center, 22, 1295–1301.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share