Rubrique de la conférence de L'ACIO: Adopter une approche interprofessionnelle de prise de décision partagée pour encourager l’implication des patients
Abstract
Le traitement et le dépistage du cancer ne font pas l’objet de décisions faciles puisque ces décisions dépendent du choix éclairé que doit faire le patient. Une prise de décision interprofessionnelle et partagée a lieu lorsque deux professionnels de la santé ou plus collaborent avec le patient pour décider ensemble de ce qu’ils feront. Pour encourager l’implication efficace du patient dans cette prise de décision, il faut cependant lui offrir des outils et du soutien. Les outils prennent typiquement la forme de textes ou de vidéos tandis que le soutien est prodigué par des professionnels de la santé expérimentés qui savent comment aider le patient à prendre une décision sans orienter cette dernière. Les deux modes d’intervention permettent au patient d’énoncer clairement sa décision, d’obtenir sur les choix qui lui sont proposés des renseignements impartiaux fondés sur les meilleures données probantes disponibles, et de déterminer ce qui est le plus important pour lui. La présente étude vise à discuter des manières dont les infirmières en oncologie peuvent adopter une approche interprofessionnelle de prise de décision partagée.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Association nord-américaine des diagnostics infirmiers (ANADI/NANDA). (2005). NANDA Nursing diagnoses: definitions & classification 2005–2006. Philadelphia: Author.
Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1997). Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine, 44(5), 681–692.
Committee on Quality of Health Care. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century (pp. 1–8). Washington, D.C.: Institute of Medicine.
Couet, N., Desroches, S., Robitaille, H., Vaillancourt, H., LeBlanc, A., Turcotte, S., … Légaré, F. (2013). Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: A systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Health Expectations, epub Jan 2013, 1–20.
Fowler, F.J., Gallagher, P.M., Drake, K.M., & Sepucha, K.R. (2013). Decision dissonance: Evaluating an approach to measuring the quality of surgical decision making. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 39(3), 136–144.
Fowler, F.J., McNaughton Collins, M., Albertsen, P.C., Zietman, A., Elliott, D.B., & Barry, M.J. (2000). Comparison of recommendations by urologists and radiation oncologists for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA, 283(24), 3217–3222.
The Health Foundation. (2013). Implementing shared decision making: Clinical teams’ experiences of implementing shared decision making as part of the MAGIC programme. www.health.org.uk/publications/the-magic-programme-evaluation/
Hibbard, J.H., & Greene, J. (2013). What the evidence shows about patient activation: Better health outcomes and care experiences. Health Affairs, 32(2), 207–214.
Hurst, N.P., Kind, P., Ruta, D., Hunter, M., & Stubbings, A. (1997). Measuring health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: Validity, responsiveness and reliability of EuroQol (EQ-5D). British Journal of Rheumatology, 36(5), 551–559.
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES). (2008). Cancer surgery in Ontario: ICES Atlas. Toronto, ON: Author.
Joseph-Williams, N., Elwyn, G., & Edwards, A. (2014). Knowledge is not power for patients: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Education & Counseling, 94(3), 291–309.
Kiesler, D.J., & Auerbach, S.M. (2006). Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behaviour: Evidence, models and interventions. Patient Education & Counseling, 61, 319–341.
Légaré, F., Kearing, S., Clay, K., Gagnon, S., D’Amour, D., Rousseau, M., & O’Connor, A. (2010). Are you SURE? Assessing patient decisional conflict with a 4-item screening test. Canadian Family Physician, 56(8), e308–e314.
Légaré, F., Stacey, D., Gagnon, S., Dunn, S., Pluye, P., Frosch, D., … Graham, I.D. (2011). Validating a conceptual model for an interprofessional approach to shared decision making: A mixed methods study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(4), 554–564.
Légaré, F., Stacey, D., Pouliot, S., Gauvin, F.P., Desroches, S., Kryworuchko, J., … Graham, I.D. (2011). Interprofessionalism and shared decision-making in primary care: A stepwise approach towards a new model. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25(1), 18–25.
Légaré, F., Stacey, D., Turcotte, S., Cossi, M. J., Kryworuchko, J., Graham, I.D., … Donner-Banzhoff, N. (2014). Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev., (9), 1–166.
Légaré, F., & Thompson-Leduc, P. (2014). Twelve myths about shared decision making. Patient Education & Counseling. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.06.014
Makoul, G., & Clayman, M.L. (2006). An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Education & Counseling, 60(3), 301–312.
Menzel, H., Coleman, J., & Katz, E. (1959). Dimensions of being modern in medical practice. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 9(1), 20–40.
O’Connor, A.M., Stacey, D., & Légaré, F. (2008). Coaching to support patients in making decisions. British Medical Journal, 336, 228–229.
Pearce, A., Newcomb, C., & Husain, S. (2008). Recommendations by Canadian urologists and radiation oncologists for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 2(3), 197–203.
Queen’s Cancer Research. (2013). Treatment choices for early stage prostate cancer in 2013: Patients’ questions doctors’ answers. Kingston, ON: Institute. Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen’s University.
Shepherd, H.L., Barratt, A., Trevena, L.J., McGeechan, K., Carey, K., Epstein, R.M., … Tattersall, M.H.N. (2011). Three questions that patients can ask to improve the quality of information physicians give about treatment options: A cross-over trial. Patient Education & Counseling, 84, 379–385.
Stacey, D., Kryworuchko, J., Belkora, J., Davison, B.J., Durand, M.A., Eden, K.B., … Street, R.L. (2013). Coaching and guidance with patient decision aids: A review of theoretical and empirical evidence. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13(Suppl. 2), 1–11.
Stacey, D., Kryworuchko, J., Bennett, C., Murray, M.A., Mullan, S., & Légaré, F. (2012). Decision coaching to prepare patients for making health decisions: A systematic review of decision coaching in trials of patient decision aids. Medical Decision Making, 32(3), E22–33.
Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Col, N.F., Bennett, C.L., Barry, M.J., Eden, K.B., … Wu, J.H.C. (2014). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(1). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4
Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Pouliot, S., Kryworuchko, J., & Dunn, S. (2010). Shared decision making models to inform an interprofessional perspective on decision making: A theory analysis. Patient Education & Counseling, 80, 164–172.
Stacey, D., Pomey, M.P., O’Connor, A.M., & Graham, I.D. (2006). Adoption and sustainability of decision support for patients facing health decisions: An implementation case study in nursing. Implementation Science, 1(17), 1–10.
Stacey, D., Taljaard, M., Drake, E.R., & O’Connor, A.M. (2008). Audit and feedback using the brief Decision Support Analysis Tool (DSAT-10) to evaluate nurse-standardized patient encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 73, 519–525.
Wei, J.T., Dunn, R.L., Litwin, M.S., Sandler, H.M., & Sanda, M.G. (2000). Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life inmen with prostate cancer. Urology, 56(6), 899–905.
Wennberg, J.E. (2002). Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: Implications for academic medical centres. British Medical Journal, 325, 961–964.
Weston, W.W. (2001). Informed and shared decision-making: The crux of patient-centred care. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 165(4), 438–439.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.