CANO Conference Feature: Engaging patients using an interprofessional approach to shared decision making

Dawn Stacey, France Légaré

Abstract


Many cancer treatment and screening decisions are difficult given that they rely upon patients’ informed preferences. Interprofessional shared decision making is when two or more health care professionals collaborate with a patient to reach an agreed-upon decision. To support patients’ engagement in shared decision making, effective interventions include patient decision aids and/or decision coaching. Patient decision aids are typically written or video-based resources, while decision coaching is provided by trained health care professionals who are supportive but non-directive. Both interventions make explicit the decision, provide balanced information on options based on the best available evidence, and help patients consider what matters most. The overall aim is to discuss how oncology nurses can engage in an interprofessional approach to shared decision making.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1997). Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine, 44(5), 681–692.

Committee on Quality of Health Care. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century (pp. 1–8). Washington, D.C.: Institute of Medicine.

Couet, N., Desroches, S., Robitaille, H., Vaillancourt, H., LeBlanc, A., Turcotte, S., … Légaré, F. (2013). Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: A systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Health Expectations, epub Jan 2013, 1–20.

Division of Cancer Care & Epidemiology. (2014). Prostate Cancer Decision Aid for Early-stage Patients. Cancer Research Institute, Queen’s University, Ontario, Canada.

Fowler, F.J., Gallagher, P.M., Drake, K.M., & Sepucha, K.R. (2013). Decision dissonance: Evaluating an approach to measuring the quality of surgical decision making. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 39(3), 136–144.

Fowler, F.J., McNaughton Collins, M., Albertsen, P.C., Zietman, A., Elliott, D.B., & Barry, M.J. (2000). Comparison of recommendations by urologists and radiation oncologists for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA, 283(24), 3217–3222.

The Health Foundation. (2013). Implementing shared decision making: Clinical teams’ experiences of implementing shared decision making as part of the MAGIC programme. www.health.org.uk/publications/the-magic-programme-evaluation/

Hibbard, J.H., & Greene, J. (2013). What the evidence shows about patient activation: Better health outcomes and care experiences. Health Affairs, 32(2), 207–214.

Hurst, N.P., Kind, P., Ruta, D., Hunter, M., & Stubbings, A. (1997). Measuring health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: Validity, responsiveness and reliability of EuroQol (EQ-5D). British Journal of Rheumatology, 36(5), 551–559.

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES). (2008). Cancer surgery in Ontario: ICES Atlas. Toronto, ON: Author.

Joseph-Williams, N., Elwyn, G., & Edwards, A. (2014). Knowledge is not power for patients: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Education & Counseling, 94(3), 291–309.

Kiesler, D.J., & Auerbach, S.M. (2006). Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behaviour: Evidence, models and interventions. Patient Education & Counseling, 61, 319–341.

Légaré, F., Kearing, S., Clay, K., Gagnon, S., D’Amour, D., Rousseau, M., & O’Connor, A. (2010). Are you SURE? Assessing patient decisional conflict with a 4-item screening test. Canadian Family Physician, 56(8), e308–e314.

Légaré, F., Stacey, D., Gagnon, S., Dunn, S., Pluye, P., Frosch, D., … Graham, I.D. (2011). Validating a conceptual model for an interprofessional approach to shared decision making: A mixed methods study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(4), 554–564.

Légaré, F., Stacey, D., Pouliot, S., Gauvin, F.P., Desroches, S., Kryworuchko, J., … Graham, I.D. (2011). Interprofessionalism and shared decision-making in primary care: A stepwise approach towards a new model. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25(1), 18–25.

Légaré, F., Stacey, D., Turcotte, S., Cossi, M. J., Kryworuchko, J., Graham, I.D., … Donner-Banzhoff, N. (2014). Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev., (9), 1–166.

Légaré, F., & Thompson-Leduc, P. (2014). Twelve myths about shared decision making. Patient Education & Counseling, 96(3), 281–286. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.06.014

Makoul, G., & Clayman, M.L. (2006). An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Education & Counseling, 60(3), 301–312.

Menzel, H., Coleman, J., & Katz, E. (1959). Dimensions of being modern in medical practice. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 9(1), 20–40.

NANDA International. (2005). NANDA nursing diagnoses: Definitions & classification 2005–2006. Philadelphia: Author.

O’Connor, A.M., Stacey, D., & Légaré, F. (2008). Coaching to support patients in making decisions. British Medical Journal, 336, 228–229.

Pearce, A., Newcomb, C., & Husain, S. (2008). Recommendations by Canadian urologists and radiation oncologists for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 2(3), 197–203.

Queen’s Cancer Research. (2013). Treatment choices for early stage prostate cancer in 2013: Patients’ questions doctors’ answers. Kingston, ON: InstituteDivision of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen’s University.

Shepherd, H.L., Barratt, A., Trevena, L.J., McGeechan, K., Carey, K., Epstein, R.M., … Tattersall, M.H.N. (2011). Three questions that patients can ask to improve the quality of information physicians give about treatment options: A cross-over trial. Patient Education & Counseling, 84, 379–385.

Stacey, D., Kryworuchko, J., Belkora, J., Davison, B.J., Durand, M.A., Eden, K.B., … Street, R.L. (2013). Coaching and guidance with patient decision aids: A review of theoretical and empirical evidence. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13(Suppl. 2), 1–11.

Stacey, D., Kryworuchko, J., Bennett, C., Murray, M.A., Mullan, S., & Légaré, F. (2012). Decision coaching to prepare patients for making health decisions: A systematic review of decision coaching in trials of patient decision aids. Medical Decision Making, 32(3), E22–33.

Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Col, N.F., Bennett, C.L., Barry, M.J., Eden, K.B., … Wu, J.H.C. (2014). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(1). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4

Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Pouliot, S., Kryworuchko, J., & Dunn, S. (2010). Shared decision making models to inform an interprofessional perspective on decision making: A theory analysis. Patient Education & Counseling, 80, 164–172.

Stacey, D., Pomey, M.P., O’Connor, A.M., & Graham, I.D. (2006). Adoption and sustainability of decision support for patients facing health decisions: An implementation case study in nursing. Implementation Science, 1(17), 1–10.

Stacey, D., Taljaard, M., Drake, E.R., & O’Connor, A.M. (2008). Audit and feedback using the brief Decision Support Analysis Tool (DSAT-10) to evaluate nurse-standardized patient encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 73, 519–525.

Wei, J.T., Dunn, R.L., Litwin, M.S., Sandler, H.M., & Sanda, M.G. (2000). Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Urology, 56(6), 899–905.

Wennberg, J.E. (2002). Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: Implications for academic medical centres. British Medical Journal, 325, 961–964.

Weston, W.W. (2001). Informed and shared decision-making: The crux of patient-centred care. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 165(4), 438–439.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.