Infusion unit nurses’ ratings of risk factors for difficult intravenous access (DIVA) differ based on patients’ type of cancer

Emely Alfaro, Marissa Canote, Teresa Cosgrove, Ruby Ejercito, Jung-Ja Hawker, Marisa Quinn, Christine Miaskowski

Abstract


The majority of patients receiving cancer chemotherapy are treated in the outpatient setting and require peripheral intravenous (IV) access. The purpose of this work was to evaluate for differences in infusion unit nurses’ ratings of predictors of difficult intravenous access (DIVA) based on whether they cared for patients with solid tumours versus hematologic malignancies. Nurses (N=152) received an email with a link to a Qualtrics survey. Nurses completed the “Survey on Nurses” perceived DIVA factors that asked them to rate each factor using a 0 (not at all predictive) to 10 (extremely predictive) numeric rating scale. Compared to nurses who cared for patients with solid tumours, those who cared for patients with hematologic malignancies rated the following predictors higher: patient is overweight, patient has obesity, occurrence of psychomotor agitation, and occurrence of needle phobia or anxiety. Findings can be used to guide the education of infusion unit nurses on specific risk factors for DIVA.

Keywords: cancer; chemotherapy; difficult intravenous access; infusion

DOI:10.5737/23688076352321


Full Text:

PDF

References


Armenteros-Yeguas, V., Garate-Echenique, L., Tomas-Lopez, M. A., Cristobal-Dominguez, E., Moreno-de Gusmao, B., Miranda-Serrano, E., & Moraza-Dulanto, M. I. (2017). Prevalence of difficult venous access and associated risk factors in highly complex hospitalised patients. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(23–24), 4267–4275. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13750

Blondeaux, E., Poggio, F., & Del Mastro, L. (2019). Role of dose-dense chemotherapy in high-risk early breast cancer. Current Opinion in Oncology, 31(6), 480–485. https://doi.org/10.1097/cco.0000000000000571

Brophy, L., Bales, A., Ziemann, J. K., Navigato, K., & Contreras, C. (2022). A review of the literature related to limb precautions after lymph node dissection. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 26(1), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1188/22.CJON.86-92

DeSnyder, S. M., Yi, M., Boccardo, F., Feldman, S., Klimberg, V. S., Smith, M., Thiruchelvam, P. T. R., & McLaughlin, S. (2021). American Society of Breast Surgeons’ practice patterns for patients at risk and affected by breast cancer-related lymphedema. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 28(10), 5742–5751. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10494-0

Duncanson, E., Le Leu, R. K., Shanahan, L., Macauley, L., Bennett, P. N., Weichula, R., McDonald, S., Burke, A. L. J., Collins, K. L., Chur-Hansen, A., & Jesudason, S. (2021). The prevalence and evidence-based management of needle fear in adults with chronic disease: A scoping review. PLoS One, 16(6), e0253048. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253048

Ehrhardt, B. S., Givens, K. E. A., & Lee, R. C. (2018). Making it stick: Developing and testing the difficult intravenous access (DIVA) tool. American Journal of Nursing, 118(7), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000541440.91369.00

Fields, J. M., Piela, N. E., & Ku, B. S. (2014). Association between multiple IV attempts and perceived pain levels in the emergency department. Journal of Vascular Access, 15(6), 514–518. https://doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000282

Gallieni, M., Pittiruti, M., & Biffi, R. (2008). Vascular access in oncology patients. CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 58(6), 323–346. https://doi.org/10.3322/CA.2008.0015

Jakes, A. D., & Twelves, C. (2015). Breast cancer-related lymphoedema and venepuncture: A review and evidence-based recommendations. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 154(3), 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3639-1

Juvin, P., Blarel, A., Bruno, F., & Desmonts, J. M. (2003). Is peripheral line placement more difficult in obese than in lean patients? Anesthesia and Analgesia, 96(4), 1218. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000050570.85195.29

Kim, M., Suh, D. H., Lee, K. H., Eom, K. Y., Lee, J. Y., Lee, Y. Y., Hansen, H. F., Mirza, M. R., & Kim, J. W. (2020). Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2019. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 31(3), e48. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e48

Laddu, D., Neeland, I. J., Carnethon, M., Stanford, F. C., Mongraw-Chaffin, M., Barone Gibbs, B., Ndumele, C. E., Longenecker, C. T., Chung, M. L., & Rao, G. (2024). Implementation of obesity science into clinical practice: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 150(1), e7–e19. https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000001221

Laksonen, R. P., Jr., & Gasiewicz, N. K. (2015). Implementing a program for ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access: Training, policy and procedure development, protocol use, competency, and skill tracking. Nursing Clinics of North America, 50(4), 771–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2015.07.010

McLaughlin, S. A., DeSnyder, S. M., Klimberg, S., Alatriste, M., Boccardo, F., Smith, M. L., Staley, A. C., Thiruchelvam, P. T. R., Hutchison, N. A., Mendez, J., MacNeill, F., Vicini, F., Rockson, S. G., & Feldman, S. M. (2017). Considerations for clinicians in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema, recommendations from an expert panel: Part 2: Preventive and therapeutic options. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 24(10), 2827–2835. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5964-6

Pagnutti, L., Bin, A., Donato, R., Di Lena, G., Fabbro, C., Fornasiero, L., Gerratana, A., Rigon, L., Gonella, S., & Palese, A. (2016). Difficult intravenous access tool in patients receiving peripheral chemotherapy: A pilot-validation study. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 20, 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2015.06.008

Piredda, M., Biagioli, V., Barrella, B., Carpisassi, I., Ghinelli, R., Giannarelli, D., & De Marinis, M. G. (2017). Factors affecting difficult peripheral intravenous cannulation in adults: A prospective observational study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(7–8), 1074–1084. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13444

Piredda, M., Fiorini, J., Facchinetti, G., Biagioli, V., Marchetti, A., Conti, F., Iacorossi, L., Giannarelli, D., Matarese, M., & De Marinis, M. G. (2019). Risk factors for a difficult intravenous access: A multicentre study comparing nurses’ beliefs to evidence. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28(19–20), 3492–3504. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14941

Robertson, R., Broers, B., & Harris, M. (2021). Injecting drug use, the skin and vasculature. Addiction, 116(7), 1914–1924. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15283

Sebbane, M., Claret, P. G., Lefebvre, S., Mercier, G., Rubenovitch, J., Jreige, R., Eledjam, J. J., & de La Coussaye, J. E. (2013). Predicting peripheral venous access difficulty in the emergency department using body mass index and a clinical evaluation of venous accessibility. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 44(2), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.07.051

Stinson, F. S., Dawson, D. A., Patricia Chou, S., Smith, S., Goldstein, R. B., June Ruan, W., & Grant, B. F. (2007). The epidemiology of DSM-IV specific phobia in the USA: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychological Medicine, 37(7), 1047–1059. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291707000086

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services & Administration. (2023). Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2022 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. (HHS Publication No. PEP23-07-01-006, NSDUH Series H-58). Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2022-nsduh-annual-national-report

van Loon, F. H. J., van Hooff, L. W. E., de Boer, H. D., Koopman, S., Buise, M. P., Korsten, H. H. M., Dierick-van Daele, A. T. M., & Bouwman, A. R. A. (2019). The modified A-DIVA scale as a predictive tool for prospective identification of adult patients at risk of a difficult intravenous access: A multicenter validation study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020144


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.