Cancer information-seeking profiles: A self-report measure of patients’ distinct preferences for information about their cancer

Carmen G. Loiselle

Abstract


Objective: Contemporary cancer care approaches, such as value- and strengths-based health care, involve integrating patients’ needs and preferences, as the cancer experience unfolds. Distinct cancer information-seeking behaviours among patients are increasingly found to influence patient-provider communication, treatment-related decision-making, health processes and outcomes, as well as patient satisfaction with cancer care services. My program of research has already documented diverse cancer information-seeking profiles (CISP) among patients. These profiles can easily be captured by a theory-driven and empirically sound self-report single-item measure presented herein. 

Methods: Guided by Self-Evaluation Theory (SET) – which posits that individuals vary in their motivation to seek information about the self – quantitative work established that SET motives could be reproduced in health-related contexts (N = 600).  Qualitative inquiry subsequently explored information-seeking among individuals with various cancer diagnoses. Based on this series of studies, a CIPS measure (containing a general question which prompts individuals to choose the most representative statement based on five descriptions of distinct informational profiles) was tested in a large sample of individuals with diverse cancers. 

Results: In this latter sample (N = 2,142), patients were administered the CISP and the Ambulatory Oncology Patient Satisfaction Survey (AOPSS). The most frequently reported CISP was complementary (50.2%, i.e., search for cancer information that added to what patients already knew), followed by minimal (25.2%, i.e., no search for cancer information), then guarded (14.4%, i.e., avoiding negative and only seeking hopeful cancer information), peer-focused (6.4%, i.e., search for cancer information from similar others),  and last, intense (3.8%, i.e., seeking as much cancer information as possible). These profiles were also differentially related to care satisfaction with intense profiles being the least satisfied across all cancer care domains. 

Conclusions and Practice Implications:  The CISP measure can readily assess patients’ profiles in the search for (or avoidance of) information about their cancer so that more personalized interventions can be provided. Future research exploring how CISP evolves, as the cancer experience unfolds, is also worthy of further study.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, M. S., Iliescu, D., & Greiff, S. (2022). Single item measures in psychological science: A call to action. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38, 1–5.

Canadian Partnership Against Cancer. (2018). Living with cancer: A report on the patient experience. https://s22457.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Living-with-cancer-report-patient-experience-EN.pdf

Carlsson, M. E. (2000). Cancer patients seeking information from sources outside the health care system. Supportive Care in Cancer, 8(6), 453–457.

Cassileth, B. R., Zupkis, R. V., Sutton-Smith, K., & March, V. (1980). Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Annals of Internal Medicine, 92(6), 832–836.

Higgins, T., Larson, E., Schnall, R. (2017). Unraveling the meaning of patient engagement: A concept analysis. Patient Education and Counselling, 100(1), 30–36.

Lambert, S. D., & Loiselle, C. G. (2007). Health information-seeking behavior. Qualitative Health Research, 17(8), 1006–1019.

Lambert, S. D., Loiselle, C. G., & Macdonald, M. E. (2009a). An in-depth exploration of information-seeking behavior among individuals with cancer: Part 1: Understanding differential patterns of active information seeking. Cancer Nursing, 32(1), 11–23.

Lambert, S. D., Loiselle, C. G., & Macdonald, M. E. (2009b). An in-depth exploration of information-seeking behavior among individuals with cancer: Part 2: Understanding patterns of information disinterest and avoidance. Cancer Nursing, 32(1), 26–36.

Loiselle C. G. (1995). Self-evaluation and health information seeking: A study of self-assessment and self-protection motives. PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin – Madison, 229 pages. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (PQDT), UMI Number: 9525954, 1995. https://search.library.wisc.edu/catalog/999769201602121

Loiselle, C. G. (2019). Cancer information-seeking preferences linked to distinct patient experiences and differential satisfaction with cancer care. Patient Education and Counseling, 102(6), 1187–1193.

Loiselle, C. G. & Brown, T. L. (2020). Increasing access to psychosocial oncology services means becoming more person-centered and situation-responsive. Supportive Care in Cancer, 28(12), 5601–5603.

Loiselle, C. G., Edgar, L., Batist, G., Lu, J., & Lauzier, S. (2010). The impact of a multimedia informational intervention on psychosocial adjustment among individuals with newly diagnosed breast or prostate cancer: A feasibility study. Patient Education and Counseling, 80(1), 48–55.

Loiselle, C. G., Howell, D., Nicoll, I., & Fitch, M. (2019). Toward the development of a comprehensive cancer experience measurement framework. Supportive Care in Cancer, 27, 2579–2589.

Loiselle, C. G., Lambert, S. & Cooke, A. (2006). The searching, processing, and sharing of breast cancer information by women diagnosed with the illness. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 38, 82–104.

National Research Corporation (2003). Development and Validation of the Picker Ambulatory Oncology Survey Instrument in Canada.

Noteboom, E. A., May, A. M., van der Wall, E., de Wit, N. J., & Helsper, C. W. (2021). Patients’ preferred and perceived level of involvement in decision making for cancer treatment: A systematic review. Psycho-Oncology, 30(10).

Rutten, L. J. F., Arora, N. K., Bakos, A. D., Aziz, N., & Rowland, J. (2005). Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: A systematic review of research (1980–2003). Patient Education and Counseling, 57(3), 250–261.

Sedikides, C., & Strube, M. J. (1997). Self-evaluation: To thine own self be good, to thine own self be sure, to thine own self be true, and to thine own self be better. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 209–269.

Trope, Y., & Neter, E. (1994). Reconciling competing motives in self-evaluation: The role of self-control in feedback seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 646–657.

Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are the single item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247–252.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share