An evaluation of the Interdisciplinary Psychosocial Oncology Research Group and Laboratory: An initiative to enable intersectoral and interdisciplinary collaboration

Danielle Petricone-Westwood, Kari-Ann Clow, Sophie Lebel, Jennifer Brunet

Abstract


Background: Psychosocial oncology (PSO) is an interdisciplinary field that is often practised and researched in disciplinary silos. The Interdisciplinary PSO Research Group and Laboratory (IPSORGL) was developed in Ottawa (Ontario) to foster interdisciplinary collaboration and training amongst trainees, healthcare professionals (HCPs), and researchers. 

Methods: The research team conducted an implementation and outcome evaluation of the IPSORGL. Data were collected using sequential mixed methods, including surveys and interviews. 

Results: Eight trainees, six HCPs, and five researchers completed the survey. Six trainees and four HCPs participated in an interview. Benefits of the IPSORGL included establishing interdisciplinary connections and collaborations and obtaining unique training in a supportive environment. Challenges included members’ differing preferences for meeting formats and content, and difficulties prioritizing the IPSORGL over other academic or clinical demands. 

Conclusions: The IPSORGL fosters essential interdisciplinary training and collaboration, which bolsters psychosocial oncology research and practice. The sustainability of such initiatives, however, requires formal institutional support.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Choi, B. C. K., & Pak, A. W. P. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 29(6), 14.

Daem, M., Verbrugghe, M., Schrauwen, W., Leroux, S., Van Hecke, A., & Grypdonck, M. (2019). How interdisciplinary teamwork contributes to psychosocial cancer support. Cancer Nursing, 42(3), E11–E20. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000588

Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006

Heidelberg, R. E., Douglas, C., Turner, E., Elliott, A., Crabtree, V. M., & Allen, J. M. (2021). Psychosocial collaboration fosters connection in times of isolation. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 39(3), 340–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2021.1894525

Jansen, L. (2008). Collaborative and interdisciplinary health care teams: Ready or not? Journal of Professional Nursing, 24(4), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.06.013

Koritzinsky, M., Koch, C. A., Riley, B., Beauchemin, N., Johnston, G., Johnston, M., Koropatnick, J., Loiselle, C. G., Maslowska, M., McCormick, C., Miller, W. H., Mulligan, L., & Tsao, M.-S. (2016). From solo in the silo to strategic training programs. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-03-0076

Loiselle, C. G., Bottorff, J. L., Butler, L., & Degner, L. F. (2004). PORT-Psychosocial Oncology Research Training: A newly funded strategic initiative in health research. CJNR (Canadian Journal of Nursing Research), 36(1), 159–164.

Macdonald, G. C. T., Baldassarre, F., Brown, P., Hatton–Bauer, J., Li, M., Green, E., & Lebel, S. (2012). Psychosocial care for cncer: A framework to guide practice, and actionable recommendations for Ontario. Current Oncology, 19(4), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.19.981

Ratcliff, C. G., Vinson, C. A., Milbury, K., & Badr, H. (2019). Moving family interventions into the real world: What matters to oncology stakeholders? Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 37(2), 264–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2018.1498426

Robinson, M. C., Qureshi, M., Sinnarajah, A., Chary, S., de Groot, J. M., & Feldstain, A. (2021). Missing in action: Reports of interdisciplinary integration in Canadian palliative care. Current Oncology, 28(4), 2699–2707. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28040235

World Health Organization, & Public Health Agency of Canada (Eds.). (2008). Health equity through intersectoral action: An analysis of 18 country case studies. Public Health Agency of Canada.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share