Determining resource intensity weights in ambulatory chemotherapy related to nursing workload

Esther Green, Colin Preyra, Janice Stewart, Cindy McLennan, Rosemary Bland, Tamara Dus, Marsha Langhorn, Kathy Beattie, Annie Cheung, Sherrie Hertz, Haim Sechter, Judy Burns, Helen Angus, Carol Sawka

Abstract


Ontario cancer programs aim to deliver high-quality nursing care and treatment that is safe for patients and staff. The reality of health care is that financial constraints, inherent in the delivery of care, require that funding mechanisms count not only the cost of drugs, but factors such as pharmacy and nursing human resource costs. While some organizations have developed patient classification systems to measure nursing intensity and workload, these systems apply primarily to inpatient populations, and are fraught with numerous challenges, such as the need for nurses to document to justify the workload required for care. The purpose of this paper is to outline the methodology and engagement of nurses to develop regimen-based resource intensity weights that can be applied to ambulatory chemotherapy suites. The methodology included determination of workload related to nursing time to prepare, teach, counsel and assess patients, as well as time to gather supplies, access lines, monitor, manage adverse reactions, manage symptoms and document care. Resource intensity weights provide better measures of the complexity of care required by cancer patients in ambulatory settings.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Chabot, G., & Fox, M. (2005). The creation of a patient-classification

system in an outpatient infusion center setting. Oncology Nursing

Forum, 32(3), 535–538.

Colombo, A., Solberg, B., Vanderhoeft, E., Ramsay, G., & Schouten,

H. (2005). Measurement of nursing care time of specific

interventions on a hematology-oncology unit related to

diagnostic categories. Cancer Nursing, 28(6), 476–480.

Craig, K., & Huber, D. (2007). Acuity and case management: A healthy

dose of outcomes (Part II). Professional Case Management, 12(4),

–210.

Cusack, G., Jones-Wells, A., & Chisholm, L. (2004). Patient intensity

in an ambulatory oncology research center: A step forward for

the field of ambulatory care (Part I). Nursing Economics, 22(2),

–63.

Cusack, G., Jones, A., & Chisholm, L. (2004). Patient intensity in an

ambulatory oncology research center: A step forward for the

field of ambulatory care (Part III). Nursing Economics, 22(4), 193–

De Raad, J., van Gool, K., Haas, M., Haywood, P., Faedo, M., Gallego,

G., Pearson, S., & Ward, R. (2010) Nursing takes time: Workload

associated with administering cancer protocols. Clinical Journal

of Oncology Nursing, 14(6), 735–741.

Harper, K., & McCully, C. (2007). Acuity systems dialogue and

patient classification system essentials. Nursing Administration

Quarterly, 31(4), 284–299.

Huber, D., & Craig, K. (2007a). Acuity and case management: A

healthy dose of outcomes (Part I). Professional Case Management,

(3), 132–44.

Huber, D., & Craig, K. (2007b). Acuity and case management:

A healthy dose of outcomes (Part III). Professional Case

Management, 12(5), 254–69.

Jones, A., Cusack, G., & Chisholm, L. (2004). Patient intensity in an

ambulatory oncology research center: A step forward for the

field of ambulatory care (Part II). Nursing Economics, 22(3), 120–

Langhorn, M., & Morrison, C. (2001a). Redesigning processes in

ambulatory chemotherapy: Creating a patient appointment

scheduling system (Part I). Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal,

(2), 109-110.

Langhorn, M., & Morrison, C. (2001b). Redesigning processes in

ambulatory chemotherapy: Creating a patient appointment

scheduling system (Part II). Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal,

(3), 157–159.

Moore, M., & Hastings, C. (2006). The evolution of an ambulatory

nursing intensity system—Measuring nursing workload in a day

hospital setting. Journal of Nursing Administration, 36(5), 241–

Morris, R., MacNeela, P., Scott, A., Treacy, P., & Hyde, A. (2007).

Reconsidering the conceptualization of nursing workload:

Literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 57(5), 463–471.

The Systemic Therapy Advisory Working Group [STAWG] (2002).

Report of the systemic therapy advisory working group, Ontario

(unpublished report). Presented to the Ministry of Health and

Long Term Care and Cancer Care Ontario.

The Systemic Therapy Task Force. (2000). Systemic therapy task force

report. Ontario: Presented to Cancer Care Ontario (unpublished

report). April 2000.

Unruh, L. (2008). Nurse staffing and patient nurse and financial

outcomes. The American Journal of Nursing, 108(1), 62–71.

Welton, J.M., Zone-Smith, L., & Bandyopadhyay, D. (2009). Estimating

nursing intensity and direct cost using the nurse-patient

assignment. Journal of Nursing Administration, 39(6), 276–284.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share