Validation par entretien cognitif de l’outil d’évaluation des plaies malignes MWAT-R
Abstract
La détresse physique et émotionnelle que peuvent causer au patient et à sa famille les plaies malignes dues à un cancer est souvent négligée. Malheureusement, nous ne disposons pas d’outils de dépistage et d’évaluation fiables et valides pouvant aider à mieux traiter ces plaies. Cette étude a cherché à valider un outil de mesure des résultats rapportés par les patients : le Malignant Wound Assessment Tool – Research (MWAT-R). Pour ce faire, huit patients ont été recrutés et interrogés selon la méthodologie de l’entretien cognitif. La compréhension et l’impression générale des patients vis-à-vis de cet outil ont été analysées. Nous avons constaté que la formulation et les choix de réponse posaient problème aux patients. En général, les participants ont néanmoins trouvé que les questions saisissaient bien les principaux enjeux relatifs aux plaies malignes et tenaient compte du point de vue du patient. Le fait d’établir la validité apparente et de contenu du MWAT-R du point de vue des patients par la technique d’entretien cognitif vient étayer la validité de cet outil.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. (2009). Chapter 4: Screening and Assessment. In Substance abuse treatment: Addressing the specific needs of women. (Treatment improvement protocol (TIP) Series, No. 51.) Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK83253/
DeVellis, R.F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
Jobe, J. (2003). Cognitive psychology and self-reports: models and methods. Quality of Life Research, 12(3), 219–227.
Kahl, C., & Cleland, J.A. (2005). Visual analogue scale, numeric pain rating scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire: An overview of psychometric properties. Physical Therapy Reviews, 10(2), 123–128.
Knafl, K., Deatrick, J., Gallo, A., Holcombe, G., Bakitas, M., Dixon, J., & Grey, M. (2007). The analysis and interpretation of cognitive interviews for instrument development. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(2), 224–234.
Lo, S., Hu, W., Hayter, M., Chang, S., Hsu, M., & Wu, L. (2008). Experiences of living with a malignant fungating wound: A qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(20), 2699–2708.
Lund-Nielsen, B., Müller, K., & Adamsen, L. (2005a). Malignant wounds in women with breast cancer: Feminine and sexual perspectives. Journal of clinical nursing, 14(1), 56–64.
Lund-Nielsen, B., Müller, K., & Adamsen, L. (2005b). Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of a new regimen for malignant wounds in women with advanced breast cancer. Journal of Wound Care, 14(2), 69–73.
Maida, V., Ennis, M., & Kuziemsky, C. (2009). The Toronto Symptom Assessment System for Wounds: A new clinical and research tool. Advances in Skin and Wound Care, 22(10), 468-–74.
Mohan, H., Ryan, J., Whelan, B., & Wakai, A. (2010). The end of the line? The Visual Analogue Scale and Verbal Numerical Rating Scale as pain assessment tools in the emergency department. Emergency Medicine Journal, 27(5), 372–375.
Naylor, W. (2002a). Part 1: Symptom control in the management of fungating wounds. World Wide Wounds. Retrieved from http://www.worldwidewounds.com/2002/march/Naylor/Symptom-Control-Fungating-Wounds.html
Naylor, W. (2002b). Part 2: Symptom self-assessment in the management of fungating wounds. World Wide Wounds. Retrieved from http://www.worldwidewounds.com/2002/july/Naylor-Part2/Wound-Assessment-Tool.html
Naylor, W. (2005). A guide to wound management and palliative care. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 11(11), 572–579.
Newell, S., Sanson-Fisher, RW., Girgis, A., & Bonaventura, A. (1998). How well do medical oncologists’ perceptions reflect their patients’ reported physical and psychosocial problems? Data from a survey of five oncologists. Cancer, 83(8), 1640–1651.
Piggin, C., & Jones, V. (2007). Malignant fungating wounds: An analysis of the lived experience. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 13(8), 384–391.
Schulz, V., Kozell, K., Biondo, P.D., Stiles, C., Tonkin, K., & Hagen, N.A. (2009). The malignant wound assessment tool: A validation study using a delphi approach. Palliative Medicine, 23(3), 266–273.
Willis, G. (1999). Cognitive interviewing, a “how to” guide. Reducing survey error through research on the cognitive and decision processes in surveys. Short course presented at the 1999 meeting of the American Statistical Association.
Willis, G. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design, (pp.136–174) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.