Email this article 
Examining women’s perspectives regarding colposcopy in the cervical cancer screening program in rural Nigeria
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among women in sub-Saharan Africa, with Nigeria bearing a significant burden. Despite the availability of screening programs, uptake remains low, particularly in rural areas. Understanding women’s perspectives on colposcopy as part of cervical cancer screening is crucial for program improvement.
Objective: To examine women’s experiences, perceptions, and attitudes toward colposcopy cervical cancer screening programs in rural Nigeria, including knowledge of cervical cancer, screening procedure, and factors influencing screening uptake.
Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted with 41 women aged 25–49 years in rural Nigeria. Participants included both HIV-positive and HIV-negative women who had either undergone cervical cancer screening or had not accessed services. Thematic analysis was employed to analyze interview transcripts.
Results: Four major themes emerged: (1) Limited knowledge and awareness about cervical cancer and screening procedures; (2) Mixed experiences with screening processes, including inadequate pre-procedure education; (3) Multiple barriers to screening uptake including fear, stigma, transportation costs, and service delivery challenges; and (4) Recommendations for program improvement focusing on community awareness and service accessibility.
Conclusion: Women’s perspectives reveal significant knowledge gaps, service delivery challenges, and structural barriers that impede optimal cervical cancer screening uptake. Comprehensive awareness campaigns, improved service delivery including better patient education about screening procedures, and community-based approaches are essential for enhancing program effectiveness in rural Nigeria.
Keywords: cervical cancer, screening, colposcopy, women’s perspectives, barriers, rural Nigeria, HPV, visual inspection
https://doi.org/10.5737/23688076363262
References
Adamu, A., Mairiga, A. G., Klahaim, N., & Ibrahim, H. (2012). Cervical cancer screening: knowledge, attitude and practice among market women in northeastern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Medicine, 21(1), 52-56.
Akinlotan, M., Bolin, J. N., Helduser, J., Ojinnaka, C., Lichorad, A., & McClellan, D. (2017). Cervical cancer screening barriers and risk factor knowledge among uninsured women. Journal of Community Health, 42(4), 770-778.
Amadi, A., Khan, H.T. and Lawal, M. (2024) 'A Systematic Review of Healthcare Professionals and Women’s Experiences and Perceptions of Colposcopy Method of Cervical Cancer Screening in Nigeria', Journal of Global Social Sciences, 5(19)
Arbyn, M., Weiderpass, E., Bruni, L., de Sanjosé, S., Saraiya, M., Ferlay, J., & Bray, F. (2020). Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. The Lancet Global Health, 8(2), e191-e203.
Barbour, R. S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal, 322(7294), 1115-1117.
Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don't: researcher's position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219-234.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
Ebu, N. I., Mupepi, S. C., Siakwa, M. P., & Sampselle, C. M. (2015). Knowledge, practice, and barriers toward cervical cancer screening in Elmina, Southern Ghana. International Journal of Women's Health, 7, 31-39.
Ezechi, O. C., Gab-Okafor, C. V., Ostergren, P. O., & Pettersson, K. O. (2013). Willingness and acceptability of cervical cancer screening among HIV positive Nigerian women. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 46.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Globocan. (2020). Cancer statistics for Nigeria. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Retrieved from https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/566-nigeria-fact-sheets.pdf
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82.
Kim, Y. (2011). The pilot study in qualitative inquiry: Identifying issues and learning lessons for culturally competent research. Qualitative Social Work, 10(2), 190-206.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ndikom, C. M., & Ofi, B. A. (2012). Awareness, perception and factors affecting utilization of cervical cancer screening services among women in Ibadan, Nigeria: a qualitative study. Reproductive Health, 9(1), 11.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Perkins, R. B., Guido, R. S., Castle, P. E., Chelmow, D., Einstein, M. H., Garcia, F., ... & Kim, J. J. (2020). 2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 24(2), 102-131.
Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal, 320(7227), 114-116.
QSR International. (2020). NVivo 12 [Computer software]. Melbourne: QSR International.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). London: Sage.
Santos, H. P., Black, A. M., & Sandelowski, M. (2015). Timing of translation in cross-language qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 25(1), 134-146.
Squires, A. (2009). Methodological challenges in cross-language qualitative research: a research review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(2), 277-287.
Sultana, F. (2007). Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 6(3), 374-385.
Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., & Bray, F. (2021). Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71(3), 209-249.
World Health Organization. (2020). Global strategy to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem. Geneva: World Health Organization.
World Health Organization. (2022). Cervical cancer fact sheet. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cervical-cancer
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
