BRIEF COMMUNICATION: GRASP Workload Nursing Measurement System at end of life

Kalliopi Stilos, Anita Long, Eleonora Cretu

Abstract


The purpose of this quality improvement initiative was to analyze how nurses record their workload in the GRASP Workload Measurement System and document the end-of-life nursing care provided to imminently dying patients. The analysis was done in conformity with the Comfort Measures Order Set in our hospital. Nursing documentation was examined (n = 4 patient records) covering 15 oncology nursing shifts. Nurses are expected to complete the GRASP tool after each shift for all the patients in their care. It is presumed that nurses’ workload data will be reported accurately and reliably, as well as interrelate with their nursing documentation. Workload audits are conducted routinely to ensure accuracy. Interrater Reliability Monitoring was used to analyze the degree of agreement between the ratings performed on the audit of the completed GRASP tool and the nursing documentation on end-of-life care delivered. The GRASP compliance rate was 66.6% and GRASP-documentation accuracy rate was 60–70%. These observations were below the established target of 90%. The results provide insight regarding any gaps between documentation and GRASP at end of life. 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alghamdi, M. A. (2016). Nursing workload: A concept analysis. Journal of Nursing Management, 24 (4), 449–457. https://doi-org.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/10.1111/jonm.12354

Ferguson-Paré, M., & Bandurchin, A. (2010). The Ontario Nursing Workload Demonstration Projects: Rethinking how we measure, cost and plan the work of nurses. Nursing Leadership, 23, 20–32. https://doi:10.12927/cjnl.2010.21745

Freeman, B. (2013). CARES: An acronym organized tool for the care of the dying. Journal of Hospice Palliative Care Nursing, 15(3), 147–153.

Hadley, F., Graham, K., & Fannery, M. (2005). Workforce Management Objective A: Workload Measurement Tools. Canadian Nurses Association. https://www.cnaaiic.ca/~/media/cna/pagecontent/pdffr/workload_measurement_tools_e.pdf

Hunter, B. M., & Murray, S. F. (2019). Deconstructing the financialization of healthcare. Development and Change, 50(5), 1263–1287. https://doi-org.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/10.1111/dech.12517

Michaelson, S., Long, A., & Avila, E. 2017. ConGRASPulations, a success story: The revival of workload to ensure tomorrow’s success. Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal, 27(4), 386–387.

Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. (2008/2009). Ontario guide to case costing. http://www.ontla.on.ca/library/repository/mon/23009/295252.pdf

Mittman, N., Seung, S. J., Pisterz, L. F., Isogai, P. K., & Michaels, D. (2008). Nursing workload associated with hospital patient care. Disease Management & Health Outcomes, 16(1),53–61.

Qureshi, S. M., Purd, N., Mohani, A., & Neumann, W. P. (2019). Predicting the effect of nurse-patient ratio on nurse workload and care quality using discrete event simulation. https://doi-org.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/10.1111/jonm.12757

Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario. (2005). Nursing workload measurement systems – A discussion of the issues. https://rnao.ca/policy/reports/Nursing-Workload-Measurment-Systems-Discussion-Paper

Stilos, K., Wynnychuk, L., DasGupta, T., Lilien, T., & Daines, P. (2016). Improving end-of-life care through quality improvement. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 22(1), 430–434.

Sunnybrook Health Science Centre. (2015). Nursing Workload Measurement System – Infor (formerly GRASP) Policy. https://vpn2.sunnybrook.ca/,DanaInfo=

sunnynet.ca+default.aspx?cid=101440 https://doi-org.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/10.1111/jonm.12757


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.